This report has been updated. Click here to view latest edition.
If you have previously purchased the archived report below then please use the download links on the right to download the files.
1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
1.1. | An introduction to printed and flexible sensors |
1.2. | Opportunities for SWIR image sensors |
1.3. | Growth areas for printed piezoresistive sensors |
1.4. | Printed piezoresistive sensor application assessment |
1.5. | Solution processed or hybrid ITO alternatives for capacitive touch |
1.6. | Opportunities for printed temperature sensors |
1.7. | Opportunities for printed gas/humidity sensors |
1.8. | Wearable technology: An opportunity for capacitive strain sensors. |
1.9. | Glucose test strips: A large but declining market |
1.10. | Printed wearable electrode sensors: Opportunities in healthcare and fitness monitoring. |
1.11. | 10-year forecast for printed sensor revenue by sensor type (Sensor categories: Image, pressure, gas & humidity, temperature, strain, wearable, glucose test strips) |
1.12. | 10-year printed sensor forecast by revenue (Sensor categories: Image, pressure, gas & humidity, temperature, strain, wearable) |
1.13. | 10-year printed sensor forecast by revenue: All categories |
1.14. | 10-year printed sensor forecast by unit volume (in m2): All categories |
1.15. | 10-year printed sensor forecast by unit volume (in m2): All categories (excluding biosensors) |
1.16. | Key takeaways |
2. | INTRODUCTION |
2.1. | What is a sensor? |
2.2. | Sensor value chain example: Digital camera |
2.3. | What defines a 'printed' sensor? |
2.4. | Printed sensor manufacturing |
2.5. | Motivation for printed electronics: Flexibility |
2.6. | Motivation for printed electronics: Ease of manufacturing |
2.7. | A brief overview of screen, slot-die, gravure and flexographic printing |
2.8. | A brief overview of digital printing methods |
2.9. | Towards roll to roll (R2R) printing |
2.10. | Printed sensor categories |
2.11. | What proportion is printed? |
2.12. | Opportunities for printed sensors: Facilitating computational data analysis |
2.13. | Opportunities for printed sensors: Healthcare |
2.14. | Opportunities for printed sensors: Human machine interfaces (HMI) |
3. | PHOTODETECTORS AND IMAGE SENSORS |
3.1.1. | Types of printed photodetectors/image sensors |
3.1.2. | Photodetector working principles |
3.1.3. | Quantifying photodetector and image sensor performance |
3.1.4. | The printed photodetector competitive landscape |
3.2. | Organic photodetectors for large area image sensors |
3.2.1. | Organic photodetectors (OPDs) |
3.2.2. | OPDs: Advantages and disadvantages |
3.2.3. | Reducing OPD dark current |
3.2.4. | Manipulating the detection wavelength |
3.2.5. | Extending OPDs to the NIR region: Use of cavities |
3.2.6. | Manufacturing challenges for cavity OPDs |
3.2.7. | What can you do with organic photodetectors? |
3.2.8. | 'Fingerprint on display' with OPDs |
3.2.9. | Challenges for printed OPDs |
3.2.10. | First OPD production line |
3.2.11. | Applications based on TFT active matrix |
3.2.12. | Manipulating OPD properties by changing molecular structure. |
3.2.13. | OPDs for biometric security |
3.2.14. | Spray-coated organic photodiodes for medical imaging. |
3.2.15. | Flexible image sensors based on amorphous Si |
3.2.16. | Materials for OPDs |
3.2.17. | Challenges for large area OPD adoption |
3.2.18. | Technical requirements/manufacturing approaches for OPD applications: Biometric recognition, smart shelving, x-ray sensing and SWIR imaging |
3.2.19. | SWOT analysis of large area OPD image sensors |
3.2.20. | Organic photodetector forecast |
3.3. | Motivation for infra-red sensing |
3.3.1. | Applications for NIR/SWIR imaging |
3.3.2. | SWIR for autonomous mobility |
3.3.3. | Other SWIR benefits: Better hazard detection |
3.3.4. | Towards broadband hyperspectral imaging |
3.3.5. | SWIR sensitivity of PbS QDs, Si, polymers, InGaAs, HgCdTe, etc... |
3.3.6. | NIR sensing: limitation of Si CMOS |
3.3.7. | Existing long wavelength detection: InGaAs |
3.3.8. | InGaAs sensor design: Solder bumps limit resolution |
3.3.9. | Innovative silicon based SWIR sensors (Trieye) |
3.3.10. | OmniVision: making silicon CMOS sensitive to NIR (II) |
3.3.11. | SWIR: Incumbent and emerging technology options |
3.4. | OPD on CMOS hybrid image sensors |
3.4.1. | OPD on CMOS hybrid image sensors |
3.4.2. | Hybrid organic/CMOS sensor for broadcast cameras |
3.4.3. | Comparing hybrid organic/CMOS sensor with backside illumination CMOS sensor |
3.4.4. | Hybrid organic/CMOS sensor (III) |
3.4.5. | Progress in CMOS global shutter using silicon technology only |
3.4.6. | Fraunhofer FEP: SWIR OPD-on-CMOS sensors |
3.4.7. | SWOT analysis of OPD-on-CMOS image sensors |
3.5. | Quantum dot on CMOS hybrid image sensors |
3.5.1. | Quantum dots as optical sensor materials |
3.5.2. | Lead sulphide as quantum dots |
3.5.3. | Quantum dots: Choice of the material system |
3.5.4. | Applications and challenges for quantum dots in image sensors |
3.5.5. | QD layer advantage in image sensor (I): Increasing sensor sensitivity and gain |
3.5.6. | QD-Si hybrid image sensors(II): Reducing thickness |
3.5.7. | Detectivity benchmarking |
3.5.8. | QD-Si hybrid image sensors(III): Enabling high resolution global shutter |
3.5.9. | QD-Si hybrid image sensors(IV): Low power and high sensitivity to structured light detection for machine vision? |
3.5.10. | Advantage of solution processing: ease of integration with ROIC CMOS? |
3.5.11. | How is the QD layer applied? |
3.5.12. | QD optical layer: Approaches to increase conductivity of QD films |
3.5.13. | Quantum dots: Covering the range from visible to near infrared |
3.5.14. | Hybrid quantum dots for SWIR imaging (I) |
3.5.15. | SWIR Vision Sensors: first QD-Si cameras and/or an alternative to InVisage (now Apple)? |
3.5.16. | SWIR Vision Sensors: First commercial QD-CMOS cameras |
3.5.17. | Emberion: QD-graphene SWIR sensor |
3.5.18. | Emberion: QD-Graphene-Si broad range SWIR sensor |
3.5.19. | QD-on-CMOS from Hanyang University (South Korea) |
3.5.20. | Challenges for QD-Si technology for SWIR imaging. |
3.5.21. | Advantage of solution processing: Ease of integration with CMOS ROICs? |
3.5.22. | Quantum dot films: Processing challenges |
3.5.23. | How is the QD layer applied? |
3.5.24. | PdS QDs: Optical sensor with high responsibility and wide spectrum |
3.5.25. | Results and status for QD-Si sensors |
3.5.26. | Nanoco loses the Apple project |
3.5.27. | QD-on-CMOS integration examples (IMEC) |
3.5.28. | QD-on-CMOS integration examples (RTI International) |
3.5.29. | QD-on-CMOS integration examples (ICFO) |
3.5.30. | QD-on-CMOS integration examples (ICFO continued) |
3.5.31. | Overview of OPD-on-CMOS and QD-on-CMOS sensors |
3.5.32. | Prospects for QD/OPD-on-CMOS detectors |
3.5.33. | QD-on-CMOS sensors ongoing technical challenges |
3.5.34. | SWOT analysis of QD-on-CMOS image sensors |
3.6. | Summary: Printed image sensors |
3.6.1. | Comparison of image sensors technologies |
3.6.2. | Printed photodetector application assessment |
3.6.3. | Printed image sensor supplier overview |
3.6.4. | Technology readiness level snapshot of printed image sensors |
3.6.5. | Printed image sensor adoption roadmap |
3.6.6. | Printed image sensor application status summary |
3.6.7. | Printed image sensors forecast methodology |
3.6.8. | 10-year organic photodetector forecast by sales volume (in m2) and revenue |
3.6.9. | 10-year printed/hybrid image sensors forecast by sales volume (in m2) and revenue |
3.6.10. | Company profiles: Printed image sensors |
4. | PRINTED PIEZORESISTIVE SENSORS |
4.1.1. | Printed piezoresistive sensors: An introduction |
4.1.2. | Comparison with capacitive touch sensors |
4.2. | Printed piezoresistive sensor technology |
4.2.1. | What is piezoresistance? |
4.2.2. | Percolation dependent resistance |
4.2.3. | Quantum tunnelling composite |
4.2.4. | Printed piezoresistive sensors: Anatomy |
4.2.5. | Pressure sensing architectures |
4.2.6. | Thru mode sensors |
4.2.7. | Shunt mode sensors |
4.2.8. | Force vs resistance characteristics |
4.2.9. | Manipulating the force-resistance curve |
4.2.10. | Importance of actuator area |
4.2.11. | FSR inks |
4.2.12. | Complete material portfolio approach is common |
4.2.13. | Composition dependence |
4.2.14. | Shunt-mode FSR sensors by the roll |
4.2.15. | Example FSR circuits |
4.2.16. | Effect of circuit design on sensor output |
4.2.17. | 3D multi-touch pressure sensors |
4.2.18. | Matrix pressure sensor architecture |
4.2.19. | Printed foldable force sensing solution |
4.2.20. | Hybrid FSR/capacitive sensors (Tangio) |
4.2.21. | Hybrid FSR/capacitive sensors |
4.2.22. | Curved sensors with consistent zero (Tacterion) |
4.2.23. | Technological development of piezoresistive sensors. |
4.3. | Applications of printed piezoresistive sensors |
4.3.1. | Applications of piezoresistive sensors |
4.3.2. | Medical applications of printed FSR (Tekscan) |
4.3.3. | Teeth topography from Innovation Lab |
4.3.4. | Large-area pressure sensors |
4.3.5. | Force sensor examples: Sensing Tex |
4.3.6. | Force sensor examples: Vista Medical |
4.3.7. | Automotive occupancy and seat belt alarm sensors |
4.3.8. | Consumer electronic applications of printed FSR |
4.3.9. | Textile-based applications of printed FSR |
4.3.10. | SOFTswitch: Force sensor on fabric |
4.3.11. | Pressure sensitive fabric (Vista Medical) |
4.3.12. | Piezoresistive sensors in smartphones |
4.3.13. | A portable MIDI controller - The Morph (Sensel) |
4.3.14. | Smart carpet to enforce social distancing (due to coronavirus) |
4.3.15. | Printed piezoresistive sensor application assessment |
4.4. | Summary: Printed piezoresistive sensors |
4.4.1. | Business models for printed piezoresistive sensors |
4.4.2. | R2R vs S2S manufacturing |
4.4.3. | Readiness level snapshot of printed piezoresistive sensor technologies |
4.4.4. | Force sensitive resistor sensor supplier overview |
4.4.5. | Printed piezoresistive sensor adoption roadmap |
4.4.6. | SWOT analysis of piezoresistive sensors |
4.4.7. | 10-year printed piezoresistive sensor forecast by sales volume (in m2) and revenue (Categories: industrial, medical, consumer, automotive) |
4.4.8. | Summary: Printed piezoresistive sensor applications |
4.4.9. | Company profiles: Piezoresistive sensors |
5. | PRINTED PIEZOELECTRIC SENSORS |
5.1.1. | Piezoelectricity: An introduction |
5.1.2. | Piezoelectric polymers |
5.1.3. | PVDF-based polymer options for sensing and haptic actuators |
5.1.4. | Low temperature piezoelectric inks (I) (Meggitt) |
5.1.5. | Piezoelectric polymers |
5.1.6. | Printed piezoelectric sensor |
5.1.7. | Printed piezoelectric sensors: prototypes |
5.1.8. | Pyzoflex |
5.1.9. | Piezoelectric actuators in loudspeaker/microphones |
5.1.10. | PiezoPaint (Meggit) |
5.1.11. | Haptic actuators |
5.1.12. | Example application: Haptic gloves |
5.1.13. | Combining energy harvesting and sensing |
5.2. | Summary: Printed piezoelectric sensors |
5.2.1. | SWOT analysis of piezoelectric sensors |
5.2.2. | Piezoelectric sensor supplier overview |
5.2.3. | 10-year pressure sensor forecast (piezoelectric and hybrid) by sales volume (in m2) and revenue |
5.2.4. | Summary: Piezoelectric sensors |
5.2.5. | Company profiles: Piezoelectric sensors |
6. | STRAIN SENSORS |
6.1.1. | High-strain sensors (capacitive) |
6.1.2. | Use of dielectric electroactive polymers (EAPs) |
6.2. | Strain sensor applications |
6.2.1. | Players with EAPs: Parker Hannifin |
6.2.2. | Strain sensor applications |
6.2.3. | Players with EAPs: Stretchsense |
6.2.4. | Players with EAPs: Bando Chemical |
6.2.5. | C Stretch Bando: Progress on stretchable sensors |
6.2.6. | Other strain sensors (capacitive & resistive) |
6.2.7. | Strain sensor examples: Polymatech |
6.2.8. | Strain sensor example: Yamaha and Kureha |
6.2.9. | Strain sensor examples: BeBop Sensors |
6.2.10. | Industrial displacement sensors (LEAP Technology) |
6.3. | Summary: Strain sensors |
6.3.1. | Summary: Strain sensors |
6.3.2. | SWOT analysis of flexible strain sensors |
6.3.3. | Printed strain sensor forecast |
6.3.4. | Printed high-strain sensor supplier overview |
6.3.5. | Company profiles: Strain sensors |
7. | ITO REPLACEMENT FOR CAPACITIVE TOUCH |
7.1.1. | Capacitive sensors |
7.1.2. | Printed capacitive sensors |
7.1.3. | Conductive materials for capacitive sensors |
7.2. | Transparent conductive materials: ITO |
7.2.1. | ITO film assessment: performance, manufacture and market trends |
7.2.2. | ITO film shortcomings: flexibility |
7.2.3. | ITO film shortcomings: limited sheet conductivity |
7.2.4. | ITO film shortcomings: Limited sheet resistance |
7.2.5. | ITO film shortcomings: index matching |
7.2.6. | ITO film shortcomings: thinness |
7.2.7. | ITO film shortcomings: price falls and commoditization |
7.2.8. | ITO films: Current prices (2018) |
7.2.9. | Indium: Price fluctuations drive innovation |
7.2.10. | Indium's single supply risk: real or exaggerated? |
7.2.11. | Recycling comes to the rescue? |
7.2.12. | SWOT analysis of ITO |
7.3. | ITO alternatives: Silver nanowires (Ag NW) |
7.3.1. | Silver nanowires: basic introduction |
7.3.2. | Ag NW: growth process |
7.3.3. | Ag NWs: roll to roll formation |
7.3.4. | Ag NW: Trade off between sheet resistance and transmission |
7.3.5. | Ag NWs: Mechanical flexibility |
7.3.6. | Ag NWs: 300,000 cycles and more with 1mm radius |
7.3.7. | Ag NW: Patterning |
7.3.8. | Ag NW: Ready-to-expose films? |
7.3.9. | Ag NW: the haze issue |
7.3.10. | Ag haze: Demonstrating impact of NW aspect ratio |
7.3.11. | Stability |
7.3.12. | Ag NWs: The stability issue been finally solved? |
7.3.13. | Ag NWs: Photostability |
7.3.14. | Ag NWs: Past or existing applications |
7.3.15. | Ag NWs: Emerging applications |
7.3.16. | Improving conductivity between Ag NWs - C3 Nano |
7.3.17. | Foldable displays incorporating C3 Nano's AgNWs |
7.3.18. | Future trends... |
7.3.19. | Combining AgNW and CNTs for a TCF material (Chasm) |
7.3.20. | Prospects for Ag NW adoption |
7.3.21. | SWOT analysis of silver nanowires as a transparent conductor |
7.4. | ITO Alternatives: Metal mesh |
7.4.1. | Metal mesh: Photolithography followed by etching |
7.4.2. | Fujifilm's photo-patterned metal mesh |
7.4.3. | Toppan Printing's copper mesh transparent conductive films |
7.4.4. | Panasonic's large area metal mesh |
7.4.5. | GiS (integrator): Large area metal mesh displays |
7.4.6. | Embossing/imprinting metal mesh |
7.4.7. | O-Film's metal mesh technology: The basics |
7.4.8. | Will O-Film rejuvenate its metal mesh business after disappointing sales? |
7.4.9. | MNTech's metal mesh TCF technology (the incident) |
7.4.10. | J-Touch: substantial metal mesh capacity |
7.4.11. | Nanoimprinting metal mesh with 5um linewidth |
7.4.12. | Metal mesh TCF is flexible |
7.4.13. | Direct printed metal mesh transparent conductive films: performance |
7.4.14. | Direct printed metal mesh transparent conductive films: major shortcomings |
7.4.15. | Komura Tech: Improvement in gravure offset printed fine pattern (<5 um) metal mesh TCF ? |
7.4.16. | Shashin Kagaku: offset printed metal mesh TCF |
7.4.17. | Komori: Gravure offset all-printed metal mesh film? |
7.4.18. | Asahi Kasei: taking steps to commercialize its R2R ultrafine printing process |
7.4.19. | How is the ultrafine feature R2R mold fabricated? |
7.4.20. | Konica Minolta: inkjet printing large area fine pitch metal mesh TCFs with <10um linewidth? |
7.4.21. | Gunze: S2S screen printing finds a market fit? |
7.4.22. | Toray's photocurable screen printed paste for fine line metal mesh |
7.4.23. | Ishihara Chemical's gravure printed photo-sintered Cu paste |
7.4.24. | Toppan Forms: Ag salt inks to achieve 4um printed metal mesh? |
7.4.25. | Eastman Kodak: Transparent ultra low-resistivity RF antenna using printed Cu metal mesh technology |
7.4.26. | Kuroki/ITRI: printed seed layer and plate Cu metal mesh? |
7.4.27. | Replacing photolithography with photoresist printing for ultra fine metal mesh |
7.4.28. | LCY gravure printing photoresist then etching |
7.4.29. | Screen Holding: gravure printing photoresist then etching |
7.4.30. | Consistent Materials' photoresist for metal mesh |
7.4.31. | Tanaka Metal's metal mesh technology |
7.5. | ITO Alternatives: Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) |
7.5.1. | Introduction to Carbon Nanotubes (CNT) |
7.5.2. | CNTs: Ideal vs reality |
7.5.3. | Not all CNTs are equal |
7.5.4. | Benchmarking of different CNT production processes |
7.5.5. | Price position of CNTs (from SWCNT to FWCNT to MWCNT) |
7.5.6. | Carbon nanotube transparent conductive films: performance |
7.5.7. | Carbon nanotube transparent conductive films: performance of commercial films on the market |
7.5.8. | Carbon nanotube transparent conductive films: Matched index |
7.5.9. | Carbon nanotube transparent conductive films: mechanical flexibility |
7.5.10. | Example of wearable device using CNT |
7.6. | ITO alternatives: PEDOT:PSS |
7.6.1. | PEDOT:PSS |
7.6.2. | Patterning PEDOT:PSS |
7.6.3. | Performance of PEDOT:PSS has drastically improved |
7.6.4. | PEDOT:PSS is now on a par with ITO-on-PET |
7.6.5. | PEDOT:PSS is mechanically flexible |
7.6.6. | Stability and spatial uniformity of PEDOT:PSS |
7.6.7. | Commercial product using PEDOT:PSS |
7.6.8. | Use case examples of PEDOT:PSS TCFs |
7.6.9. | Force Foundation: PEDOT used in solution coated smart windows |
7.6.10. | SWOT analysis of PEDOT:PSS as a TCF |
7.7. | Summary of ITO alternatives |
7.7.1. | Quantitative benchmarking of different TCF technologies |
7.7.2. | Technology comparison |
7.7.3. | TCF material supplier overview |
7.7.4. | Company profiles: ITO alternatives for capacitive touch |
8. | TEMPERATURE SENSORS |
8.1.1. | Introduction to printed temperature sensors |
8.1.2. | Types of temperature sensors |
8.1.3. | Comparing resistive temperature sensors and thermistors |
8.1.4. | PST Sensors: Silicon nanoparticles ink |
8.1.5. | Printed silicon nanoparticle sensors (PST) |
8.1.6. | Printed metal RTD sensors: Brewer Science |
8.1.7. | Substrate challenges for printed temperature sensors |
8.1.8. | Academic research: Printed temperature sensor with stabilized PEDOT:PSS |
8.2. | Applications of printed temperature sensors |
8.2.1. | Coffee temperature sensors |
8.2.2. | Research at PARC (Xerox) |
8.2.3. | Time Temperature Indicators (TTIs) |
8.2.4. | Chemical TTIs |
8.2.5. | Chemical Time Temperature Indicators |
8.2.6. | Examples of Chemical Time Temperature Indicators (TTIs) |
8.2.7. | Proof-of-concept prototype of an integrated printed electronic tag |
8.2.8. | Wearable temperature monitors |
8.2.9. | Novel applications for flexible temperature sensors |
8.2.10. | CNT temperature sensors (Brewer Science) |
8.2.11. | Temperature monitoring for electric vehicles batteries |
8.2.12. | Printed temperature sensors and heaters (IEE) |
8.3. | Summary: Printed temperature sensors |
8.3.1. | SWOT analysis of printed temperature sensors |
8.3.2. | Printed temperature sensor supplier overview |
8.3.3. | Prospects for temperature sensors |
8.3.4. | 10-year printed temperature sensors forecast by sales volume (m2) and revenue (Categories: organic and inorganic active materials) |
8.3.5. | Company profiles: Printed temperature sensors |
9. | GAS AND HUMIDITY SENSORS |
9.1.1. | Printed gas sensors: An introduction |
9.2. | Gas sensor technology |
9.2.1. | Gas sensor industry |
9.2.2. | History of chemical sensors |
9.2.3. | Transition to miniaturised gas sensors |
9.2.4. | Comparison between classic and miniaturised sensors |
9.2.5. | Concentrations of detectable atmospheric pollutants |
9.2.6. | Five common detection principles for gas sensors |
9.2.7. | Sensitivity for main available gas sensors |
9.2.8. | Comparison of miniaturised sensor technologies |
9.2.9. | Pellistor gas sensors |
9.2.10. | Metal oxide semiconductors (MOS) gas sensors |
9.2.11. | Printing MOS sensors |
9.2.12. | Electrochemical (EC) gas sensors |
9.2.13. | Infrared gas sensors |
9.2.14. | Electronic nose (e-Nose) |
9.2.15. | Integrating an 'electronic nose' with a flexible IC |
9.2.16. | Screen printed MOS sensors (Figaro) |
9.2.17. | MOS gas sensors with printed electrodes (FIS) |
9.2.18. | Printed components of electrochemical gas sensor |
9.2.19. | Printed traditional EC gas sensor |
9.2.20. | Screen printed miniaturised EC gas sensor |
9.2.21. | Screen printed MOS sensors (Renesas Electronics) |
9.2.22. | Printed carbon nanotube based gas sensors |
9.2.23. | Printed humidity/moisture sensor (Brewer Science) |
9.2.24. | Humidity sensors based on organic electronics (Invisense) |
9.3. | Emerging markets for printed gas sensors |
9.3.1. | Gas sensors will find use in various IoT segments |
9.3.2. | Gas sensors in automotive industry |
9.3.3. | Emerging market: Personal devices |
9.3.4. | Gas sensors for mobile devices |
9.3.5. | Mobile phones with air quality sensors |
9.3.6. | H2S professional gas detector watch |
9.3.7. | Air quality monitoring for smart cities |
9.3.8. | Home And Office Monitoring: A Connected Environment |
9.4. | Summary: Gas and humidity sensors |
9.4.1. | Prospects for gas and humidity sensors |
9.4.2. | The gas sensor value chain |
9.4.3. | Technology readiness level snapshot of gas sensors |
9.4.4. | Supplier overview: Printed gas and humidity sensors |
9.4.5. | Porters' five forces analysis for printed gas sensors |
9.4.6. | Future challenges for sensor manufacturers |
9.4.7. | 10-year printed gas and humidity sensors forecasts by sales volume (in m2) and revenue (Categories: uMOS, electrochemical, CNT, humidity) |
9.4.8. | Company profiles: Gas and humidity sensors |
10. | PRINTED BIOSENSORS |
10.1.1. | Electrochemical biosensors present a simple sensing mechanism |
10.1.2. | Electrochemical biosensor mechanisms |
10.1.3. | Enzymes used in PoC electrochemical biosensors |
10.1.4. | Electrode deposition: screen printing vs sputtering |
10.1.5. | Challenges for printing electrochemical test strips |
10.2. | Biosensors for glucose sensing |
10.2.1. | Anatomy of a glucose test strip |
10.2.2. | Glucose test strip monitoring through an associated reader |
10.2.3. | Sensors for diabetes management roadmap |
10.2.4. | Summary: Printed biosensors |
10.2.5. | Introduction to printed biosensors for diabetes management |
10.2.6. | CGM begins to replace test strips (Abbott) |
10.2.7. | Comparing test strip costs with CGM |
10.2.8. | Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is causing glucose test strip use to decline. |
10.3. | Printed biosensors for other applications |
10.3.1. | Electrochemical sensors are a more accurate method of ketone monitoring |
10.3.2. | Lactic acid monitoring for athletes |
10.3.3. | Traditional lactic acid monitors |
10.3.4. | Cholesterol as an early indicator of cardiovascular disease |
10.3.5. | A real market for PoC cholesterol tests? |
10.4. | Summary: Biosensors |
10.4.1. | The future of electrochemical PoC biosensors |
10.4.2. | SWOT analysis of printed biosensors |
10.4.3. | Supplier overview: Biosensors |
10.4.4. | Printed biosensors market forecast |
10.4.5. | Biosensors: Company profiles |
11. | PRINTED WEARABLE ELECTRODES AND SKIN PATCHES |
11.1.1. | Introduction to printed wearable electrodes and skin patches |
11.1.2. | Applications for electrodes and skin patches |
11.1.3. | Using electrodes to measure biopotential |
11.1.4. | Disposable metal snap electrodes - the current electrode technology |
11.1.5. | Market for metal snap Ag/AgCl electrodes |
11.1.6. | Skin patches with integrated electrodes - an opportunity for printed electrodes. |
11.2. | Examples of printed electrodes in skin patches |
11.2.1. | Smart patch with printed silver ink (Quad Industries) |
11.2.2. | QT Medical develop printed electrodes and interconnects |
11.2.3. | Printed electrodes and interconnects for pregnancy monitoring (Monica Healthcare) |
11.2.4. | Flexible and stretchable electrode (ScreenTec OY) |
11.2.5. | Printed wireless wearable electrodes (Dupont) |
11.2.6. | Printable dry ECG electrodes (Henkel) |
11.2.7. | New printed electrode materials form Henkel |
11.2.8. | Comparing printed and metal snap electrode performance |
11.2.9. | Advantages of printed dry electrode adhesives |
11.2.10. | Grid printed electrodes (Nissha GSI) |
11.2.11. | Alternative printed electrode materials |
11.3. | Electrodes in smart clothing and e-textiles |
11.3.1. | E-Textiles: Where textiles meet electronics |
11.3.2. | Biometric monitoring in apparel |
11.3.3. | Integrating heart rate monitoring into clothing |
11.3.4. | Sensors used in smart clothing for biometrics |
11.3.5. | Companies with biometric monitoring apparel products |
11.3.6. | Textile electrodes |
11.3.7. | E-textile material use over time |
11.3.8. | Printed electrodes on clothing (Toyobo) |
11.3.9. | Monitoring racehorse health with printed electrodes (Toyobo) |
11.3.10. | Stretchable conductive printed electrodes (Nanoleq) |
11.4. | Summary: Flexible wearable electrodes |
11.4.1. | SWOT analysis of printed flexible wearable electrodes |
11.4.2. | Summary: Flexible wearable electrodes |
11.4.3. | Supplier overview: Printed electrodes for skin patches and e-textiles |
11.4.4. | Company profiles: Flexible wearable electrodes |
12. | PRINTED SENSORS WITH FHE |
12.1.1. | Defining flexible hybrid electronics (FHE) |
12.1.2. | FHE Examples: Combing conventional components with flexible/printed electronics on flexible substrates |
12.1.3. | FHE: The best of both worlds? |
12.1.4. | Overcoming the flexibility/functionality compromise |
12.1.5. | What counts as FHE? |
12.1.6. | Integrating sensors in FHE circuits |
12.2. | Examples of printed sensors in FHE circuits |
12.2.1. | Wine temperature sensing label |
12.2.2. | Printed electronics enabling multi component integration some use NFC as wireless power |
12.2.3. | Wearable ECG sensor from VTT |
12.2.4. | PlasticArm: An electronic nose with FHE |
12.2.5. | PlasticArm: Utilizing bespoke flexible processors |
12.2.6. | Condition monitoring multimodal sensor array |
12.2.7. | 'Sensor-less' sensing of temperature and movement |
12.2.8. | FHE and printed sensors for smart packaging. |
12.3. | Summary: Printed sensors in FHE circuits |
12.3.1. | SWOT analysis of printed sensors in FHE circuits |
12.3.2. | Supplier overview: Printed sensors in FHE circuits |
12.3.3. | Company profiles: Flexible hybrid electronics |
13. | MARKET FORECASTS |
13.1.1. | Market forecast methodology |
13.1.2. | Difficulties of forecasting discontinuous technology adoption |
13.1.3. | 10-year printed sensors forecast by sales volume (in m2) (sensor categories: image, pressure, gas & humidity, temperature, strain, wearable electrodes) |
13.1.4. | 10-year overall printed sensors forecast by revenue (no biosensors) |
13.1.5. | 10-year overall printed sensors forecast by revenue (with biosensors) |
13.1.6. | 10-year printed sensor forecast by revenue: All categories (except biosensors) |
13.1.7. | Printed image sensors forecast methodology |
13.1.8. | 10-year organic photodetector forecast by volume (in m2) and by revenue |
13.1.9. | 10-year printed/hybrid image sensors forecast by volume (in m2) and by revenue |
13.1.10. | 10-year piezoresistive sensor forecast by volume (in m2) and by revenue |
13.1.11. | 10-year other pressure sensor forecast (piezoelectric and hybrid) by volume (in m2) and by revenue |
13.1.12. | 10-year printed strain forecast by volume (in m2) and by revenue |
13.1.13. | 10-year printed temperature sensor forecast (Categories: inorganic and organic) |
13.1.14. | 10-year printed gas and humidity sensors forecasts by sales volume (in m2) and revenue (Categories: uMOS, electrochemical, CNT, humidity) |
13.1.15. | 10-year printed biosensors forecast by volume in m2 and revenue |
13.1.16. | 10-year wearable electrodes forecast by volume in m2 and revenue (Categories: Skin patch electrodes, smart clothing electrodes, other wearable electrodes) |
13.1.17. | 10-year forecast: Material opportunities from printed sensors (by revenue and volume) |
Slides | 537 |
---|---|
Forecasts to | 2030 |